Home | Connectors | OpenText Core Content - Metadata | OpenText Core Content - Metadata - WoodWing Studio Integration and Automation
OpenText Core Content - Metadata and WoodWing Studio complement each other well in enterprise publishing environments where editorial teams need structured content creation, while governance teams need consistent metadata, classification, and reporting. Integrating the two platforms helps improve content discoverability, approval control, reuse, and downstream publishing efficiency.
Data flow: WoodWing Studio to OpenText Core Content - Metadata
Editorial teams create articles, campaigns, and channel content in WoodWing Studio, then send the content to OpenText Core Content - Metadata for controlled metadata assignment and validation before final publication or archival. Required fields such as content type, audience, region, product line, and publication date can be enforced through metadata rules.
Data flow: Bi-directional
WoodWing Studio can push editorial content and associated attributes into OpenText Core Content - Metadata, while OpenText returns standardized classification values such as taxonomy terms, campaign codes, or content categories. This ensures that content is tagged consistently across print, web, mobile, and social publishing workflows.
Data flow: OpenText Core Content - Metadata to WoodWing Studio
WoodWing Studio users can search OpenText Core Content - Metadata for approved content assets, templates, or reference materials using governed metadata filters. Editors can quickly locate the right approved content based on subject, campaign, rights status, or expiration date and reuse it in new publications.
Data flow: WoodWing Studio to OpenText Core Content - Metadata
When content is submitted from WoodWing Studio, metadata values can determine the next workflow step in OpenText Core Content - Metadata, such as legal review, brand approval, translation, or regional adaptation. For example, content tagged as regulated or market-specific can be routed automatically to the correct approver group.
Data flow: WoodWing Studio to OpenText Core Content - Metadata
After publication, final versions of articles, layouts, and supporting assets from WoodWing Studio can be archived in OpenText Core Content - Metadata with standardized metadata for retention, legal hold, and retrieval. This creates a reliable record of what was published, when, and for which audience or channel.
Data flow: Bi-directional
WoodWing Studio can provide workflow status, content stage, and editorial ownership data, while OpenText Core Content - Metadata contributes classification and repository metadata. Combined, this enables reporting on content volume, turnaround time, content type distribution, and publication readiness by region, brand, or campaign.
Data flow: WoodWing Studio to OpenText Core Content - Metadata
Content marked in WoodWing Studio for translation can be passed to OpenText Core Content - Metadata with required localization metadata such as source language, target market, priority, and reuse rights. This helps localization teams process content correctly and ensures translated versions remain linked to the original asset.
Data flow: Bi-directional
WoodWing Studio manages active content creation and review, while OpenText Core Content - Metadata governs the lifecycle state, retention category, and archival rules. Integration allows content to move from draft to approved to archived states with metadata-driven controls that reflect business policy.