Home | Connectors | OpenText eDOCS | OpenText eDOCS - Ziflow Integration and Automation
Data flow: OpenText eDOCS ? Ziflow
Legal marketing teams can store draft brochures, attorney bios, case studies, and client alerts in OpenText eDOCS for controlled document management, then send approved versions to Ziflow for structured review and sign-off. This ensures that legal, compliance, and brand stakeholders review the same controlled file before publication.
Business value: Reduces approval delays, improves version accuracy, and creates a clear audit trail for externally published legal content.
Data flow: OpenText eDOCS ? Ziflow
For client deliverables tied to a specific matter, OpenText eDOCS can act as the system of record for final and working documents, while Ziflow manages visual review and comments during the approval cycle. Once feedback is resolved in Ziflow, the approved file and final status can be pushed back to eDOCS and filed under the correct matter.
Business value: Keeps matter files complete, improves collaboration between legal and creative teams, and reduces the risk of storing the wrong version in the matter record.
Data flow: OpenText eDOCS ? Ziflow
Corporate legal departments often need to review client notices, policy updates, settlement communications, or regulatory correspondence that includes design elements or formatted layouts. Documents can be routed from eDOCS into Ziflow for line-by-line and visual proofing, then returned to eDOCS after approval for secure retention.
Business value: Supports compliance review, shortens turnaround time, and ensures the final approved communication is archived in the legal repository.
Data flow: Ziflow ? OpenText eDOCS
When legal teams review creative assets such as infographics, presentation decks, or branded templates, Ziflow can capture comments and approval decisions while OpenText eDOCS stores the final approved version with version history and security controls. This is useful when legal or compliance teams need to retain evidence of what was approved and when.
Business value: Provides a defensible record of approvals, simplifies retrieval of final assets, and supports governance requirements.
Data flow: OpenText eDOCS ? Ziflow
Policy manuals, ethics training materials, and internal guidance documents often require input from legal, HR, compliance, and communications teams. OpenText eDOCS can store the authoritative draft and final policy documents, while Ziflow manages collaborative review, annotations, and approval routing for the formatted version.
Business value: Improves coordination across departments, reduces email-based review chaos, and ensures only approved policy content is published internally.
Data flow: Ziflow ? OpenText eDOCS
After a proof is approved in Ziflow, the final file, approval summary, reviewer comments, and timestamps can be automatically filed into OpenText eDOCS under the relevant client, matter, or document category. This creates a complete record without manual download and upload steps.
Business value: Saves administrative time, improves record completeness, and strengthens auditability for legal and regulated content.
Data flow: OpenText eDOCS ? Ziflow
For sensitive legal documents that require controlled external or cross-functional review, OpenText eDOCS can provide the secure source file while Ziflow handles proofing with role-based access and approval tracking. This is useful for documents such as engagement letters, client-facing disclosures, or branded legal templates that need limited visibility during review.
Business value: Maintains document security while enabling efficient review, reducing the need to distribute files through unsecured channels.
Data flow: Bi-directional
Organizations can use Ziflow to capture detailed review history, comments, and approval timestamps, then synchronize that evidence into OpenText eDOCS alongside the final document. This creates a single, searchable record that combines content management with proofing history for legal, compliance, and audit purposes.
Business value: Strengthens governance, supports regulatory inquiries, and makes it easier to demonstrate who approved what and when.