OpenText Trading Grid Cartographer - OpenText Core Signature Integration and Automation

Common Integration Use Cases Between OpenText Trading Grid Cartographer and OpenText Core Signature

OpenText Trading Grid Cartographer and OpenText Core Signature complement each other well in enterprises that manage large partner ecosystems and document-driven approval processes. Cartographer provides visibility into B2B connections, data flows, and operational dependencies, while Core Signature enables secure, legally binding digital approvals. Together, they can improve control, traceability, and speed across partner-facing and internal workflows.

1. Contract Approval Workflow for B2B Partner Onboarding

Data flow: OpenText Trading Grid Cartographer to OpenText Core Signature

When a new trading partner is added to the B2B ecosystem, Cartographer can identify the required integration endpoints, message types, and impacted business units. That information can trigger a contract or onboarding agreement in Core Signature for legal, procurement, and compliance approval. This reduces delays in partner setup and ensures the agreement reflects the actual integration scope.

Business value: Faster partner onboarding, fewer manual handoffs, and better alignment between technical integration details and legal approval.

2. Signature-Based Approval of EDI and API Trading Agreements

Data flow: Bi-directional

Trading agreements, implementation guides, and service-level documents can be prepared in Core Signature for approval by internal stakeholders and external partners. Once signed, the agreement status and metadata can be linked back to Cartographer so integration teams can see which partner connections are authorized and active. This creates a clear relationship between signed documents and live integration mappings.

Business value: Stronger governance, easier auditability, and reduced risk of unauthorized partner connections.

3. Change-Control Signoff for Integration Mapping Updates

Data flow: OpenText Trading Grid Cartographer to OpenText Core Signature

When Cartographer detects a change in a partner route, message schema, endpoint, or dependency, it can initiate a formal change approval workflow in Core Signature. Architecture, operations, and business owners can review and sign off on the change before it is deployed. This is especially useful for regulated industries where integration changes require documented approval.

Business value: Better change control, reduced production risk, and documented approval history for audits.

4. Customer or Supplier Onboarding Pack with Signed Documents

Data flow: OpenText Core Signature to OpenText Trading Grid Cartographer

During onboarding, Core Signature can collect signed forms such as trading partner agreements, data processing terms, or onboarding acknowledgments. Once completed, the signed documents and key metadata can be associated with the partner profile in Cartographer. Integration teams then have a single view of both the technical connection and the supporting legal documentation.

Business value: Improved onboarding completeness, faster issue resolution, and easier compliance verification.

5. Audit Evidence for Partner Connectivity and Authorization

Data flow: Bi-directional

Cartographer can provide evidence of which systems, partners, and message flows are in scope for a specific business process. Core Signature can provide the signed approvals that authorized those connections or documents. Together, they support audit requests by linking operational integration evidence with legally binding approvals.

Business value: Faster audit response, stronger compliance posture, and reduced effort assembling evidence from multiple teams.

6. Exception Handling for Missing or Expired Signatures

Data flow: OpenText Trading Grid Cartographer to OpenText Core Signature

If Cartographer identifies a partner connection that is active but lacks a current signed agreement or has an expired approval, it can trigger a Core Signature workflow for renewal or re-approval. This helps prevent business interruptions caused by outdated legal documents and ensures integration activity stays aligned with policy.

Business value: Lower compliance risk, fewer service disruptions, and proactive governance of partner relationships.

7. Cross-Functional Visibility for Operations and Legal Teams

Data flow: Bi-directional

Operations teams can use Cartographer to see the technical status and dependencies of partner integrations, while legal and business teams can use Core Signature to track document status and approval progress. By synchronizing key status indicators between the two systems, organizations can create a shared operational view of both integration health and contractual readiness.

Business value: Better collaboration across teams, fewer status meetings, and more transparent decision-making.