Home | Connectors | Prodigy | Prodigy - OpenText Core Content - Metadata Integration and Automation
Direction: OpenText Core Content - Metadata to Prodigy
Use governed metadata from OpenText Core Content to automatically select and prioritize content for labeling in Prodigy. For example, documents tagged as ?customer complaint,? ?invoice exception,? or ?product defect? can be routed into specific annotation projects for NLP or computer vision model training.
Direction: Prodigy to OpenText Core Content - Metadata
After data scientists or subject matter experts label content in Prodigy, the resulting labels can be written back as metadata fields in OpenText Core Content. This is useful when annotated documents, images, or text need to remain searchable and governed in the enterprise content repository.
Direction: OpenText Core Content - Metadata to Prodigy
Use controlled vocabularies and validation rules from OpenText Core Content to constrain label options in Prodigy. This is especially valuable for regulated industries where annotation categories must match approved business terms, such as document types, risk levels, or product codes.
Direction: OpenText Core Content - Metadata to Prodigy
Use metadata filters in OpenText Core Content to identify high-value content sets, then feed those subsets into Prodigy?s active learning workflow. For example, content with low confidence, missing metadata, or specific lifecycle statuses can be prioritized for human review and labeling.
Direction: Prodigy to OpenText Core Content - Metadata
Use labels generated in Prodigy to train custom classification models, then apply those models to large content repositories managed in OpenText Core Content. The predicted classifications can be stored as metadata to automate content organization, routing, and reporting.
Direction: Bi-directional
OpenText Core Content can surface content with incomplete, conflicting, or outdated metadata to Prodigy for expert review and relabeling. Once corrected in Prodigy, the validated labels can be synchronized back to OpenText Core Content to improve metadata quality across the repository.
Direction: Bi-directional
Use OpenText Core Content as the governed repository for source content, annotation guidelines, and approved label schemas, while Prodigy manages the labeling work itself. Final training datasets and annotation outputs can be stored back in OpenText Core Content with metadata that captures version, reviewer, and approval status.
Direction: Prodigy to OpenText Core Content - Metadata
Export annotation outcomes from Prodigy into OpenText Core Content metadata fields to support operational reporting. Teams can track labeling progress, content categories, exception rates, and model-readiness status across repositories.