Home | Connectors | Wrike | Wrike - OpenText Workflow Service Integration and Automation
Wrike and OpenText Workflow Service complement each other well in organizations that need both collaborative work management and structured workflow orchestration. Wrike is strong for task planning, team coordination, approvals, and visibility across projects, while OpenText Workflow Service is designed for controlled, rules-based business process execution tied to content, cases, and enterprise systems. Together, they can connect operational workflow automation with day-to-day execution and collaboration.
Flow: OpenText Workflow Service to Wrike, with status updates back to OpenText Workflow Service
When a campaign request is submitted through an enterprise intake process in OpenText Workflow Service, the workflow can validate required fields, route approvals, and then create a corresponding campaign project in Wrike. Marketing teams can manage tasks, deadlines, creative reviews, and dependencies in Wrike while OpenText Workflow Service retains the formal approval trail and governance record.
Business value: Faster campaign launch, fewer intake errors, and better compliance with approval policies.
Flow: Bi-directional
OpenText Workflow Service can manage the controlled review process for regulated or high-risk content, such as legal, compliance, or brand approvals. Once a content package is ready, Wrike can be used by creative teams to assign production tasks, manage proofing, and track revisions. Approval outcomes from OpenText Workflow Service can update Wrike task statuses, while Wrike can notify OpenText Workflow Service when assets are ready for formal review.
Business value: Clear separation between creative execution and governed approval, reducing rework and audit risk.
Flow: OpenText Workflow Service to Wrike
After a contract, statement of work, or customer case is approved in OpenText Workflow Service, the system can automatically create a delivery project in Wrike with predefined templates, milestones, resource assignments, and task lists. Project managers then use Wrike to coordinate delivery, track time, and manage cross-functional execution, while OpenText Workflow Service maintains the formal record of the triggering business event.
Business value: Shorter project kickoff time, fewer manual handoffs, and more consistent delivery setup.
Flow: Wrike to OpenText Workflow Service
Wrike can monitor project tasks, due dates, and dependencies. If a task is blocked by missing information, an overdue approval, or a policy exception, Wrike can trigger a case or workflow in OpenText Workflow Service for escalation. OpenText Workflow Service can route the issue to the correct department, such as legal, finance, or operations, and return resolution status to Wrike once the blocker is cleared.
Business value: Faster resolution of bottlenecks and better accountability across departments.
Flow: OpenText Workflow Service to Wrike, with document status updates from Wrike
For employee, vendor, or customer onboarding, OpenText Workflow Service can manage the formal workflow for collecting documents, validating submissions, and routing approvals. Wrike can then coordinate the operational tasks required to complete onboarding, such as account setup, training, equipment provisioning, or welcome communications. As tasks are completed in Wrike, status updates can be sent back to OpenText Workflow Service to advance the onboarding case.
Business value: Better onboarding visibility, fewer missed steps, and improved cross-team coordination.
Flow: Bi-directional
When a change request is submitted in OpenText Workflow Service, it can be reviewed and approved through a controlled process before a delivery project or release plan is created in Wrike. Development, operations, and business teams can then use Wrike to manage release tasks, dependencies, and timelines. If a release requires additional approvals or a policy exception, Wrike can send the request back to OpenText Workflow Service for formal review.
Business value: Stronger governance over change management with better execution tracking.
Flow: OpenText Workflow Service to Wrike
For complex customer cases that require coordinated internal work, OpenText Workflow Service can manage the case lifecycle and trigger work in Wrike for fulfillment activities such as investigation, content creation, remediation, or service delivery. Wrike gives the delivery team a clear task structure and project visibility, while OpenText Workflow Service keeps the customer-facing case history and workflow state synchronized.
Business value: Improved service responsiveness, better internal coordination, and more transparent case handling.
Flow: Bi-directional
Wrike provides operational progress data such as task completion, cycle time, and resource status, while OpenText Workflow Service provides workflow milestones, approvals, and case outcomes. Integrating the two allows organizations to build a more complete view of work from intake through execution and approval. This is especially useful for regulated teams that need both project visibility and process evidence.
Business value: End-to-end reporting, stronger auditability, and better management oversight.