Home | Connectors | Agility | Agility - ServiceNow Integration and Automation
Data flow: Agility → ServiceNow
Use Agility CMS to manage the static and dynamic content that appears in ServiceNow employee or customer service portals, such as help articles, onboarding pages, policy updates, and service announcements. Content teams can publish updates in Agility without developer involvement, while ServiceNow consumes the content through APIs to keep portal pages current.
Business value: Reduces portal maintenance effort, improves content consistency, and allows service teams to publish timely information faster.
Data flow: ServiceNow → Agility
When support teams create or update knowledge articles in ServiceNow, approved content can be synchronized to Agility for reuse on public websites, customer self-service portals, or campaign landing pages. This is useful for FAQs, troubleshooting guides, and product support content that should be available across multiple channels.
Business value: Eliminates duplicate content entry, improves self-service adoption, and ensures customers see the same approved information everywhere.
Data flow: ServiceNow → Agility
Integrate ServiceNow incident or major incident records with Agility to automatically publish status pages, outage banners, or incident updates on public-facing websites. For example, when a critical service disruption is logged in ServiceNow, Agility can update a customer-facing status page with approved messaging and recovery timelines.
Business value: Speeds customer communication, reduces support call volume, and improves transparency during service disruptions.
Data flow: Bi-directional
ServiceNow can manage onboarding tasks, approvals, and employee service requests, while Agility provides the onboarding content, guides, and policy pages used in employee portals. HR and internal communications teams can update onboarding content in Agility, and ServiceNow can surface the right content based on employee role, location, or onboarding stage.
Business value: Creates a more guided onboarding experience, reduces manual HR support, and keeps employee-facing content aligned with process changes.
Data flow: Agility → ServiceNow
Use Agility to manage rich descriptions, images, FAQs, and eligibility details for ServiceNow service catalog items such as software requests, access requests, or facilities services. ServiceNow then displays the content within catalog items and request forms, helping users understand what they are requesting before submission.
Business value: Improves request quality, lowers incomplete submissions, and reduces back-and-forth with service desk teams.
Data flow: Bi-directional
ServiceNow can provide user context such as department, role, location, or open cases, while Agility delivers tailored content blocks, guidance, and next-step recommendations. This enables personalized self-service pages for employees or customers, such as showing different help content for IT, finance, or field teams.
Business value: Increases self-service success rates, reduces ticket creation, and improves user satisfaction through more relevant content.
Data flow: ServiceNow → Agility
When ServiceNow change requests or release records are approved, Agility can publish release notes, maintenance notices, and customer communications to websites or portals. This is especially valuable for software vendors or internal IT teams that need to communicate planned changes to users in a controlled way.
Business value: Aligns operational change management with communication workflows, reduces missed notifications, and improves stakeholder awareness.
Data flow: Bi-directional
Agility can manage content creation and editorial approval, while ServiceNow can track governance tasks, review workflows, and compliance approvals for regulated content such as legal notices, support disclaimers, or service policies. Integration ensures that only approved content is published and that audit trails are maintained across teams.
Business value: Strengthens compliance, improves auditability, and reduces the risk of publishing unapproved content.